on 10:56 PM

Barry Switzer is promoting insurance verification company with Oklahoma officials'

Barry Switzer has been using his state and national contacts to promote a company called InsureNet that is part of a consortium bidding on a multimillion dollar state contract to use highway traffic cameras and identify motorists without vehicle insurance.

"It's something that needs to be done, whether it's InsureNet or whoever,” Switzer said. "It's a procedure that should be in place for all states — get these damn cars off the road that aren't insured.”

The former Sooner and Dallas Cowboysfootball coach confirmed he has been traveling across the country helping promote InsureNet, a Chicago-based company part of an entity called the Oklahoma Public Safety Consortium.

The consortium is one of four bidders competing for an Oklahoma insurance verification enforcement contract. Other bidders include Canadian-based Intelligent Imaging Systems of Edmonton, Alberta; MV VeriSol, headquartered in Kingston, Ga.; and American Traffic Solutions, based in Scottsdale, Ariz.

Randy Ross, deputy director of the Oklahoma Department of Central Services, said his agency is evaluating the bids and hopes to award a contract soon. He said state officials hope it will help close Oklahoma's budget gap by generating at least $50 million in new revenue.

Oklahoma Insurance Department officials estimate between 18 and 23 percent of the vehicles on Oklahoma roads are uninsured. The contract calls for fixed or mobile cameras to photograph license plates on moving vehicles. Computers would transmit the data and match it to insurance verification information on national, state and insurance company databases.

Industry officials say technology has advanced to the point it is possible to almost instantaneously determine whether a car is listed as having insurance. If no insurance is found, the owner of the vehicle would be sent a letter giving the individual the opportunity to show that a mistake has been made or pay a $250 fine.

Privacy issues raised
While some opponents claim the system smacks of government spying, industry executives say the system is not that intrusive and has many benefits for motorists who do carry insurance.

"There are no privacy issues. No personal data is involved,” said Charles Pecchio, chairman of MV VeriSol.

Switzer said the cameras don't take pictures of people in the cars.

People who have insurance will benefit because the cost of uninsured motorist coverage will drop as more people are forced to buy insurance, Pecchio said. It should also help with health insurance rates because a lot of uninsured motorists injured in accidents are going to emergency rooms and having Medicaid pay for their treatment.

The combination of improved technology and declining revenue has prompted many states to consider adopting new insurance verification enforcement systems, Pecchio said.

Switzer's connection
Switzer said InsureNet officials about a year ago asked whether he could help introduce them to state Treasurer Scott Meacham and officials at the Oklahoma Department of Public Safety.

Switzer said he was happy to oblige because he believes in their product. He said he was introduced to the InsureNet executives by insurance agent and former University of Oklahoma football player Tinker Owens, who is a company consultant.

Former Republican state Rep. Wayne Pettigrew of Edmond has also done national marketing and government relations work for the company.

Switzer said he introduced InsureNet officials to executives in several states, including Oklahoma, Texas, Tennessee, Kansas, Missouri and New Mexico.

"All I do is open the door for them,” Switzer said. "I've done that, haven't been paid a dime. ... I've invested a lot of money just flying myself around. They haven't paid my expenses or anything. ... If the states go on these contracts, I'm sure I'll get paid for doing it.”

Switzer said he has no written contract, has never invested in the company and doesn't own a share of stock. "I've done business like that,” he said. "I do business with a lot of people by handshake and so far this has been that way.”

Switzer's support of Brad Henry in the 2002 gubernatorial campaign was credited by many political observers with helping the governor get elected, but Switzer said he doesn't think his relationship had anything to do with InsureNet seeking him out.

"Brad Henry is not even involved in this,” he said.

Bids discussed
Ross said contents of pending bids are being kept secret, so it is not known exactly how various companies are proposing to construct their systems.

Jonathan Miller, chairman of InsureNet, said his company is willing to guarantee the state his consortium's system would see tags of at least 80 percent of the vehicles on Oklahoma roads each year. This would require installation of at least 200 cameras, some in marked mobile units.

Miller said his company is also willing to guarantee the state will net $40 million to $50 million in revenue during the first full year of implementation if the state's insurance verification data is accurate. The consortium would receive 30 percent of gross revenues, which would amount to more than $21 million if the state makes $50 million.

However, the winning bidder will also be responsible for paying costs of installing and operating the system. Each camera can be as much as $22,000 to $50,000, officials said.

Pecchio said his company doesn't guarantee state revenues, but he thinks the state's projection of $50 million can be reached.


on 10:53 PM

Unexpected illnesses have family on financial ropes

A few years ago, Peony Hammerquist was satisfied with her family’s health care coverage.

That was before her husband suffered an unusual brain infection that left him permanently disabled and unable to continue working as a corporate accountant.

It was before her 19-year-old daughter took out her own health insurance only to have the insurance company cancel her coverage when doctors found she had thyroid cancer.

“There’s a lot of things that need to be fixed,” Peony Hammerquist said. “You can’t live with health insurance, you can’t live without it.”

For her family, everything changed in September 2007. Before that, her husband, Don, had always been healthy.

Then one night, Don began having seizures. A sinus infection had traveled to his brain, and he slipped into a coma.

“They basically didn’t think he was going to live,” Peony said. “They told everybody, ‘Say goodbye.’”

After two months in the hospital, Don spent another six months relearning to walk, talk, and do “everything we take for granted,” Peony said. It could take five to seven years before they know what brain damage is permanent and what is temporary.

Don Hammerquist had insurance through his job. When he became ill and was unable to return to work, he was covered by COBRA insurance for 18 months — “which is atrocious, $1,000 a month just so he could stay insured,” his wife said. “Nobody would insure him at that point.”

Under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act – often referred to as COBRA — people who lose their health benefits can continue group health benefits for limited periods of time. Qualified individuals may be required to pay the entire premium for coverage, up to 102 percent of the cost.

Meanwhile, their daughter, Sara Hammerquist, unsure whether she wanted to attend college, took out her own health insurance policy, since state law no longer allowed her to be covered under her parents’ policy.

In fall 2008, Sara was in a car accident. As doctors were checking her for internal injuries, they found a lump in her throat and mentioned that she might want to have it checked.

When Sara went to the doctor for other reasons a few months later, the lump had grown. Doctors determined it was thyroid cancer, and Sara underwent two surgeries. Her cancer is currently in remission.

Meanwhile, her insurance company dropped her, rescinding coverage back to the day she took out the policy. The company claimed her cancer was a pre-existing condition that Sara must have known about.

Sara works two jobs to pay off her medical bills. She lives at home with her parents or stays with her sister in Rapid City because she can’t afford to pay rent.

The family has hired an attorney to try to get her insurance reinstated. Rates would likely be higher, though, and the insurance company is pushing to have Sarah pay more than a year’s worth of back premiums.

Attorney bills likely will amount to thousands. “But without that attorney … we wouldn’t even have a chance,” Peony said. Insurance companies “won’t listen to people like us.”

Luckily, she said, she was hired by the Spearfish School District as a teacher’s aide just as her husband’s COBRA policy was about to run out. He is now covered through her school insurance.

“I basically work for the insurance, because it’s so high,” she said. “When everything you make goes to insurance and medical bills, it’s kind of tough.”

For families like the Hammerquists, the new health care reform law could prove to be a blessing. The law’s provisions could also prevent others from finding themselves in a similar situation. Sara would have been able to stay on her parents’ insurance longer, despite the fact that she wasn’t going to school. The new law also prevents insurance companies from rescinding coverage if the policyholder has paid all premiums.

“I think it is definitely a start,” Peony said. “I think insurance companies have way too much power to just, you know, do what they want to do. You pay this insurance, but as soon as something bad happens, they want to drop you.”

Contact Heidi Bell Gease at 394-8419 or heidi.bell@rapidcityjournal.com

on 10:49 PM

Some questions about health reform

Do small businesses have to provide health care insurance and will there be new taxes?

WASHINGTON - Nearly half of all Americans in the private sector work for a business with fewer than 50 employees. These firms have always struggled to provide health benefits. And as health care costs have skyrocketed in recent years, many have been forced to drop coverage.

Today, fewer than half of firms with less than 10 employees provide health benefits, according to a survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research & Educational Trust.

The new health care law is designed specifically to help small businesses, although not all businesses will qualify for the aid. Here, in question and answer form, are some of the ways the new law may affect workers and employers:

Q: If I work for a small business, will my employer have to provide health benefits?

A: No. Starting in 2014, businesses with more than 50 full-time employees will be subject to a complex set of new rules that would penalize some businesses that do not provide health benefits.

But employers with fewer than 50 full-time workers are exempted from these new regulations.

Q: What if the small business I own or work for wants to provide health benefits?

A: This year, a new tax credit will be available to help qualifying businesses offer their employees health insurance.

Q: How does a small business qualify for the credit?

A: The credit is available to businesses that meet certain criteria. The business must have fewer than 25 full-time employees and an average wage of less than $50,000 a year. And it must pay at least half of its employees' premiums.

The size of the credit depends on how many employees work at the business and how much they are paid. The most aid goes to the smallest businesses with the lowest-paid workers.

For example, companies with fewer than 10 employees and an average wage of $25,000 a year would qualify for a credit worth 35 percent of the employer's contributions to employees' health plans. The credit is gradually phased out for larger small employers with higher paid workforces.

The credit is less generous for small nonprofits.

Q: What if I work for a small business that doesn't offer benefits?

A: There isn't much that you can do right now except try to buy an insurance policy on your own.

That is slated to change in 2014 when states set up new regulated insurance exchanges where insurers will compete to offer plans with benefits that will have to meet minimum standards. If you work for a small business that does not offer benefits, you will be able to shop for insurance on these exchanges.

The health care law also will allow small businesses with as many as 100 employees to enter an exchange, where employees could shop for coverage. Businesses that pay for a portion of their workers' benefits will be eligible for a tax credit worth as much as 50 percent of their contribution.

Q: Will there be any new taxes on small businesses to pay for all this?

A: Most taxpayers now pay 1.45 percent of their earnings to support Medicare, the federal health insurance program for the elderly. Starting in 2013, all individuals who earn more than $200,000 and couples earning more than $250,000 a year will see that percentage rise to 2.35 percent.

Many small business owners report their business income on their personal income tax returns. That could push some into the higher bracket.

This is not expected to affect most small business owners, according to the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation, which estimates that 6 percent of them report incomes in the higher range.

Owners of tanning salons will contend with one additional tax. Starting this year, customers will pay a 10 percent tax on all indoor tanning services.

on 10:47 PM


Learner driver Tom DunnLearner driver Tom Dunn is worried about the costs of driving

Millions of parents are said to be breaking the law in order to save money on car insurance for their children.

New figures suggest that 41% of parents deliberately lie when filling out policy applications.

Parents are claiming to be the main drivers on the policy, when in fact it is one of their children who is the main driver, or owner of the car.

The practice known as fronting potentially offers large savings but could lead to prosecution.

'Risky move'

Research by Co-operative Insurance found that 41% of parents were actually fronting policies at the moment, and 61% would do so in the future.

[Parents] are not only risking prosecution, but harming their chances of obtaining insurance in the future

Tim FranklinCo-operative Financial ServicesCutting the cost of car insuranceSend us your comments

Typically, insurance companies identify the practice when a car is registered to the parents' address in say, Manchester, but the car seems to spend most of its time in Leeds, where a child may be studying at university.

The industry is warning that it is an extremely risky practice.

"The view that motor insurance fronting is harmless and does not hurt anyone could not be further from the truth," said Tim Franklin, of Co-operative Financial Services.

"Parents who believe they are helping their children to save money by fronting are not only risking prosecution, but harming their chances of obtaining insurance in the future."

Costs

Tom Dunn is a 17-year-old who is learning to drive in Milton Keynes.

But that could be the closest he ever gets to owning a car for himself, because he acknowledges that he cannot afford to pay for the insurance.

"I think I would be able to buy a second-hand car, but I do not think I would ever be able to buy the car and pay for the insurance," he said.

In a test to see how much Tom would have to pay to insure the car he is learning in - a Vauxhall Corsa - the cheapest was £4,000. That was assuming the car was kept on a private driveway.

Some parents are trying to reduce such costs by any means they think is legal.

Tom's driving instructor, Bryan Greenall, said he was seeing more and more parents who are tempted to break the law by fronting their car insurance.

"I basically tell them to make sure everything is above board and legal. You do not want to be going down the route of something that is not legal, even though you do not know it is not legal," he said.

Premiums

At the Motor Insurers' Bureau - set up to compensate victims of uninsured drivers - they insist the high cost of insurance should never justify lying on an application form.

Car wing mirrorFronting could leave parents looking over their shoulder

They say the premiums being charged are not excessive.

"Yes, £4,000 is an awful lot of money but it accurately reflects the risk posed by young drivers," said Ashton West, the bureau's chief executive.

Mr West is keen to stress that fronting was an attempt to obtain money by deception, and therefore amounted to stealing.

And it was not just a criminal record parents could be saddled with. Insurers could refuse cover, and deny insurance in the future.

"If you cause injury to a third party, you will have to pick up their costs as well," said Mr West.

"That could be hundreds of thousands of pounds, and those consequences could stick with you for the rest of your life."

To see for ourselves whether parents were aware of the illegality of fronting, the BBC spoke to some as they parked up in the centre of Milton Keynes.

Within the space of 15 minutes, we spoke to three parents who told us they would be perfectly happy to put themselves as the main driver on a policy, even when it was not true.

"Anything that saves money is a good idea," one woman said.

When asked whether she knew it was illegal, she said, "I had no idea."

Another woman admitted to actually having fronted in the past.

But she too was unaware of the illegality, or of the consequences.

The survey says hard times may be forcing parents to try and save money on insurance. But it warns that if they do so illegally, the ultimate price could be prosecution.