• Forecasts tell you how many ice cream cones will be sold in July, so you can set expectations for planned costs, profits, supply chain impacts and other considerations.Economist or Iconomist?
What is an executive to do? There is more uncertainty and risk. My belief is there is not much of an alternative than to become much more analytical. This means digging deeper into the mountains of data one already has as well as becoming more proficient at predicting the future. Unfortunately most companies are far from where they want and need to be when it comes to implementing analytics. They are still relying on gut feeling, rather than hard data, when making decisions. They are short on the skilled talent and the technologies to perform analytics. What is needed by executive leaders is to create a culture for metrics in their organizations.
But what does this mean? It means that high-performing enterprises should build their competitive strategies around data-driven insights that generate results from the power of analytics of all flavors, such as segmentation and regression analysis. Commercial companies need to successfully leverage data to out-think, out-smart, and out-execute their rivals. Public sector organizations need to get more yield from their resources – more with less.
To create a culture for metrics also means clarifying some of the confusion in the marketplace about analytics, especially predictive analytics. For example, there is confusion about the difference between forecasting and predictive modeling. Here is a quick analogy to illustrate the difference:
If your goal is to do a better job of buying raw materials for the ice cream and to have them at the factory at the right time, your company needs a forecasting solution. If the marketing department is trying to figure out how, where and which most attractive customers to market the ice cream, it needs predictive modeling.
Consider these real-world forecasting examples. The hospitality industry uses forecasting to determine demand for particular rooms or properties. Financial companies use it to generate accurate sales forecasts, which feed into the planning process. Retailers create forecasts to manage pricing, staffing and inventory.
Predictive modeling delivers a different set of answers. In retail, predictive modeling identifies the most profitable customers and the underlying reasons for their loyalty. In finance, credit scoring is a type of predictive modeling used to grow customer profitability and reduce risk exposure. In the life sciences, it helps companies find promising new molecular drug compounds.
Another source of confusion involves risk management. It is not only about minimizing an organization’s risk exposure. Quite the contrary, it is all about exploiting risk for maximum competitive advantage. A risky business strategy and plan always carries high prices. Effective risk management practices are comprehensive in recognizing and evaluating all potential risks. Its goal is less volatility, greater predictability, fewer surprises, and arguably most important the ability to bounce back quickly after a risk event occurs.
A simple view of risk is that more things can happen than will happen. If we can devise probabilities of possible outcomes, then we can consider how we will deal with surprises–outcomes that are different from what we expect. We can evaluate the consequences of being wrong in our expectations. In short, risk management is about dealing in advance with the consequences of being wrong. Most organizations can not quantify their risk exposure and have no common basis to evaluate their risk appetite relative to their risk exposure. Risk appetite is the amount of risk an organization is willing to absorb to generate the returns it expects to gain. The objective is not to eliminate all risk, but rather to match risk exposure to risk appetite.
Twenty years from now will we look back at the last half century and observe there were six IT eras: mainframes, minicomputers, PCs, ERP, the Internet, and now analytics? Forecast, predictive model, or speculation? My crystal ball is clear. Analytics will become mainstream.
Gary Cokins
Columbia Missourian: "The Missouri Senate spent nearly all of its session time Monday on resolutions that would urge the state's attorney general to sue the federal government for legislation that may never see the light of day in the U.S. Congress." The legislation would urge the state attorney general to join with "other state attorneys general in threatening a lawsuit against the federal government if a version of the health care reform is passed into law. The attorneys general, led by Henry McMaster of South Carolina, have said they would sue over a provision inserted into the U.S. Senate version of health reform that was designed to win the support of conservative U.S. Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb." That language would have exempted Nebraska on a permanent basis "from funding the expansion of Medicaid that would be required under the proposed bill" (Bushnell, 2/8). Modern Healthcare, on the rise of uninsured residents in Minnesota: "Less than 60% of Minnesotans had health insurance through an employer in 2009, which contributed to a notable increase in the number of residents without insurance in a state that typically has rates of coverage higher than national averages, a new study indicates. Authors of the Minnesota Health Access Survey said the results likely will serve as a preview of other state and national surveys because Minnesota is one of the first states to report academic findings on the rate of uninsured people for 2009." The survey "found that the number of Minnesotans without insurance increased by 106,000 between 2007 and 2009, leaving the state's uninsured rate at 9.1%, compared with 7.2% two years earlier" (Carlson, 2/8). St. Paul Pioneer Press: A legislative effort "to rescue a state-run health care program for the poor took its first hesitant step Monday toward becoming law." The measure, advanced by Sen. Linda Berglin, DFL-Minneapolis, is estimated to cost roughly $320 million and "would restore coverage, now set to expire at the end of March, for those earning less than $7,800 a year." A companion measure is moving through the House. "The bill is on a fast track as one of the big early tests of the 2010 session. It passed out of the Senate's Economic Development and Housing Budget Division on Monday, will be heard in the Senate's Finance Committee today and is headed toward a vote Thursday on the floor of the Senate" (Hoppin, 2/8). This information was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with kind permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives and sign up for email delivery atkaiserhealthnews.org. © Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.States Push Ahead On Health Care Reforms And Policy Issues, Pre-Empting Some Provisions Of Congressional Efforts
Politico: "State lawmakers in at least three dozen states are pushing ahead with a series of measures aimed at pre-empting whatever might come out of Washington. On the left, Democrats in the California Senate recently approved a measure to establish a state-run, single-payer health care system favored by liberals on Capitol Hill. And on the right, conservatives in Virginia and other states are pushing legislation to stave off federal efforts to mandate that individuals secure insurance coverage or require businesses to provide it" (O'Connor, 2/9).
The Philadelphia Inquirer reports on efforts by the "Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc., which oversees health-care benefits for Philadelphia police. LEHB and its administrator, Thomas Lamb, are roundly praised for aggressively reining in costs. ... Even so, LEHB's efforts cannot offset city health-care costs that are high relative to other employers', mostly because Philadelphia employees pay little out of their own pockets. That leaves taxpayers shouldering health-care costs that jumped 123 percent from 2001 to 2008, a period in which city revenue rose only 38 percent. ... Starting in July, Lamb will be at the forefront of a new effort to control medical costs known as self-insurance. Instead of paying a premium to its insurer, Independence Blue Cross, LEHB, using city funds, will now pay claims as they come in. The city hopes to save about $5 million in fiscal 2001 because of the switch to self-insurance" (Hill, 2/9).
Kansas Health Institute: "Kansas is going to need more doctors to meet the growing needs of an aging population, officials here say. Meanwhile, the University of Kansas School of Medicine in Wichita has been successful training doctors who choose to remain in the state. Almost half its graduates have stayed in Kansas; the national average for retaining medical school graduates is 29 percent. With the aim of turning out more graduates, university officials here have long wanted to convert the Wichita campus to a four-year school. It's a two-year program, now" (Ranney, 2/9).
Los Angeles Times: "California insurance regulators asked Anthem Blue Cross to delay controversial rate increases of as much as 39% for individual policies, hikes that have triggered widespread criticism from subscribers and brokers -- and now from the federal government. In a rare step, the Obama administration called on California's largest for-profit insurer to justify its rate hikes, saying the increases were alarming at a time when subscribers face skyrocketing healthcare costs." Reuters: "Sebelius called for Anthem to offer the public a detailed explanation of the rate hike as well as other information about how much of consumers' premium dollars go toward medical care rather than other expenditures. ... While it was unclear what, if any, steps the U.S. health department could take, Sebelius said she was 'very disturbed' and was 'closely monitoring' the Anthem situation" (Heavey, 2/8). The Associated Press: Sebelius "said the company should also make public what percentage of customers' premiums go to medical care versus administrative costs. ... Sebelius said Anthem Blue Cross' parent company, WellPoint Inc., 'has seen its profits soar.' ... WellPoint earned $536 million in the final three months of last year." The Washington Post: "The unusual salvo offers a reminder that, even as health-care legislation lies in limbo in Washington, the battle over surging health care costs continues in other venues." "'We regret the impact this has on our members,' the company said in a statement. 'It highlights why we need sustainable health care reform to manage the steadily rising costs of hospitals, drugs and doctors. As such, it is important to go back to the beginning and get health care reform done right'" (Macgillis, 2/8). This information was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with kind permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives and sign up for email delivery atkaiserhealthnews.org. © Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.Anthem Blue Cross 39 Percent Rate Hike Draws Ire Of Federal, Calif. Regulators
"In a letter to Anthem's president, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius voiced serious concern over the higher premiums, which go into effect March 1 for many of the insurer's estimated 800,000 individual policyholders" (Helfand, 2/9).
"President Barack Obama cited the Anthem rate hikes in an interview with CBS' Katie Couric on Sunday as a reason to move forward with his health overhaul legislation, which is stalled in Congress" (Mohajer, 2/8).
INSURANCE The basics of insurance are simple - one company offers a guaranteed future payment for a contracted event. The company offering the guarantee charges a premium for insuring against the event's occurence - in doing so, the insurance company is protecting the client against certain circumstances, say physical capital loss due to a natural disaster. The insurance company assumes all financial responsibility associated with the client’s losses. Where the business gets complicated is in the calculations of premiums. This involves the use of complex stochastic probabilty models meant to simulate the likelihood of a given event’s occurrence. Not all events are created equal, from an insurance perspective - for some types of insurance a company can accurately predict the probability of occurence (say, automobile insurance, which has such a large sample to study that companies can make accurate predictions and judgments about demographic groups). For events that are harder to predict (say, the future value a Mortgage-Backed Security (MBS)) insurance companies take on greater risk when they issue policies. The insurance sector itself is segmented into four distinct sub-sectors: Life Insurance, Property & Casualty Insurance,Accident & Health Insurance, and Miscellaneous Insurance. Life insurance deals with policies that are written to hedge against the risk of death, accidental death, and in some cases, sickness. In many cases, liability to the insurer is limited based on cases dealing with suicide, war, riot, and fraud. Companies within the Life Insurance Sub-Sector: Casualty insurance deals with policies that are written to hedge against the risk of unforeseen accidents. Some examples are insurance policies for auto accidents or losses incurred at sea (Marine Insurance). In general, casualty insurance hedges against risks associated with liability and crime. Companies within the Casualty and Property Insurance Sub-Sector: Health insurance deals with policies that are written to hedge against the risk of unexpected or unexpectedly high health costs. Interestingly, the insurer of health insurance policy can either be from the private sector or the public sector, subsidized by taxes. Companies within the Accident and Health Insurance Sub-Sector: Assurance/guarantor companies provide insurance against default on credit instruments. They collect premiums to insure bonds against defaults and/or losses in value through insurance policies generally called "insurance enhancement products". Some examples are: Companies within the Misellaneous Insurance Sub-Sector: As the first of the baby boomers are set to retire within the next few years, financial and insurance firms remain pitted in a battle to provide them with financial funds to fuel their retirement. The traditional methods of retirement finance such as social security, 401ks, and corporate pension plans are becoming increasingly riskier as government legislature struggles to find a solution to social security deficits and companies find it harder and harder to meet the promises of current pension plans. Since the lines between financial institutions and insurance institutions has been blurred with the repeal of the 1999 repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, which restricted the ability of insurance companies to provide financial services, aging baby boomers have become an increasingly attractive market to insurance companies. Generally speaking, interest rates will affect any firm involved in any type of investment or firm that issues corporate debt or equity. Changes in the interest rate will invariably change the fundamental values of both equity and debt, since the fundamental value of debt is determined by the time weighted average of payments discounted by current short or long interest rates, and the fundamental value of equity is determined by the value of a firm today along with any projects in the future discounted by some factor over the risk free interest rate. Systematically, the interest rates are roughly set through the supply and demand of money in the economy, most of the time with help from the Federal Reserves’ monetary policy.insurance
DefinitionInsurance Industry Sub-Sectors
Life Insurance
Property & Casualty Insurance
Accident & Health Insurance
Financial Guarantors/Assurance
Miscellaneous Insurance
Whats Moving the Insurance Sector
Retiring Baby Boomer Generation/Convergence of Insurance Sector and Financial Industry
Changing Interest RatesTo compete with the corporate pensions plans provided by the company, insurance companies are offering annuities to retirees. Annuities come in many, often complex, forms and packages. However, the underlying concept remains the same: purchase of the annuity is made with an upfront lump sum, with the promise of a steady periodic income as long as the contract requires.